State of Divorce in America 2025 – A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction:

Divorce in the United States has undergone significant shifts over the past few decades. As of 2025, the nation’s divorce rate is near its lowest point in decades , even as the dynamics of who divorces (and why) continue to evolve. This Splitifi white paper compiles the latest divorce statistics 2025 – drawing on CDC vital records, U.S. Census surveys, academic research, and private studies – to provide an authoritative snapshot of divorce trends. We examine divorce rates by state, age group, and income bracket, analyze how family structure, religion, and education influence divorce outcomes, compare no-fault vs. contested divorce patterns, and chart regional trends over time. A special spotlight on Florida divorce trends highlights what’s changing in 2025. Throughout, we’ll highlight key findings (using data-driven evidence) to answer pressing questions like where divorces are most common, which factors predict marital outcomes, and why people get divorced in today’s society. Splitifi’s goal is to present the facts in a clear, digestible format – positioning our team as a leading source for U.S. divorce trends in 2025.

Divorce Rates by State in 2025

Divorce rates vary widely across the 50 states. The national divorce rate in recent years hovers around 2.3–2.5 divorces per 1,000 people (about 35-40% lifetime probability of divorce for a first marriage, by most estimates). Some states, however, significantly exceed this average, while others are well below it. States in the South and West tend to have higher divorce rates, whereas those in the Northeast tend to have the lowest. Below are highlights of the latest state-by-state divorce statistics:

• Highest Divorce Rates: Arkansas and Wyoming top the list. In 2022, Arkansas had about 11.9 divorces per 1,000 women (ages 15+), and Wyoming about 11.0 per 1,000 . (These translate to roughly 4 divorces per 1,000 total population in those states.) Other states with high divorce rates include Nevada, Oklahoma, Idaho, and Alabama, all with roughly 10–11 divorces per 1,000 women in recent data (well above the national average) . Nevada – historically famous for “quickie” marriages and divorces – still has one of the highest divorce rates (about 4.2 per 1,000 people in 2022) .

  
  

• Lowest Divorce Rates: Northeastern states see the fewest divorces. For example, Vermont’s divorce rate was only 4.6 per 1,000 women in 2022 – among the lowest in the nation . Other states with low rates include Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, New York, and Illinois, which generally report around 1.0–2.0 divorces per 1,000 people (roughly 5–6 per 1,000 women) . Massachusetts in particular has been noted as having the lowest crude divorce rate (near 1.0 per 1,000 people in some recent years) . These low-divorce states tend to have older median ages at marriage and higher educational attainment, which contribute to more stable marriages.




• Nationwide Context: Overall, divorce rates have declined substantially over time across all regions. The U.S. divorce rate peaked in the early 1980s (around 5 divorces per 1,000 people) and remained around 4.0 in 1990. By 2000, the national divorce rate was about 4.0 per 1,000; by 2010 it had fallen to 3.6, and by 2020 it hit a historic low of 2.3 during the pandemic . As of the latest provisional data for 2022, the U.S. divorce rate is roughly 2.4 per 1,000 people (with ~674,000 divorces and annulments that year) . This marks a continuation of the downward trend in divorce prevalence. Even traditionally high-divorce states have seen drops – for instance, Nevada’s crude divorce rate fell from 11.4 per 1,000 people in 1990 to 4.2 in 2022 . The decline in divorce is a key finding of modern divorce statistics – fewer couples are divorcing today than at any time in the past 40 years.

  
  

Key takeaway: “Divorce rates 2025” vary dramatically by location. Bible Belt states like Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Alabama report the highest divorce frequencies, while states in the Northeast (and some Midwest states) boast the lowest. However, virtually every state’s divorce rate has trended downward in the long run. Today’s couples are less likely to divorce than those who married in the 1970s–90s, reflecting broader social shifts. The U.S. appears to have reached a “divorce low” in recent years, with the pandemic temporarily suppressing divorces in 2020 (many courts closed and couples postponed breakups) followed by a mild rebound in 2021. Still, the overall trajectory is one of decline.

Divorce Rates by Age Group

Divorce in America also differs by age – both in terms of which age groups experience the most divorces and how divorce rates have changed within each generation. The patterns in 2025 show a tale of two trends: younger Americans are divorcing less, while older Americans are divorcing more.

• Young and Mid-Life Adults: The 25–39 age group accounts for the majority of divorces. Roughly 60% of people who get divorced are between ages 25 and 39 . This makes sense because these ages encompass the peak years of marriage (and also the peak risk period for divorce, typically within the first 5–10 years of marriage). In contrast, very young couples (teens or early 20s) marry less frequently today, but when they do marry, they have a high risk of splitting up. Marrying before age 25 is a known risk factor – those who marry in their teens or very early 20s have a significantly higher likelihood of divorce than those who marry later . For example, one study found marriages begun before age 20 have about a 32% chance of ending in divorce within five years, compared to ~20% if the marriage began at ages 20–24 . The most stable marriages are now seen in couples who marry in their late 20s to early 30s; marriages started at ages 25–34 have the lowest five-year divorce rates (around 14–15%) . After the mid-30s, divorce risk creeps up again slightly for first marriages – possibly because those who marry later may be more set in their ways or entering second marriages.




• “Gray Divorce” (Older Adults): In contrast to younger people, divorce among older adults has increased. The term “gray divorce” refers to divorces involving adults over 50, and this segment has grown notably. For example, among U.S. adults 65 and older, the divorce rate in 2022 was about 15% – roughly triple what it was in the 1990s for that age group . In other words, a much larger share of divorces today occur to older couples than a generation ago. People over 65 now make up an estimated 1 in 6 divorces , a proportion that has surprised many observers. Sociologists point to longer lifespans and greater acceptance of ending unfulfilling marriages later in life as key drivers. Many Baby Boomers, in particular, have continued to divorce at higher rates as they age, compared to the WWII-generation who had far lower late-life divorce rates. The rise of gray divorce means that more Americans are experiencing divorce in mid-life or beyond, often after long marriages (20–30+ years). This has unique financial and emotional implications, especially when retirement and health issues are involved.




• Median Age at Divorce: Reflecting the above trends, the median age of people getting divorced has been rising. As of recent data, the average divorced individual is around 45–46 years old . (By comparison, in 1990 the median age at divorce was closer to the mid-30s.) This increase in median age is partly because fewer 20-somethings are divorcing (they’re also marrying later to begin with), and more 50- and 60-somethings are now in the divorce mix. Women still tend to divorce at slightly younger ages on average than men (since women typically marry at younger ages and also have slightly shorter remarriage intervals). In 2021, the average age at first divorce was about 41 for women and 45 for men according to Census estimates .

Key takeaway: Divorce is increasingly concentrated in the late 20s to 40s. Many couples in their prime adult years do split up – but those who wait to marry until their late 20s or 30s have a better chance of lasting. Meanwhile, the U.S. is seeing a late-life divorce boom: Americans in their 50s, 60s, and beyond are divorcing at higher rates than past generations. This “graying” of divorce means that issues like retirement, adult children, and long-term alimony have become more common factors in divorce cases.

Divorce Rates by Income Bracket

Marital outcomes are closely tied to socioeconomic status. Income level is one of the strongest predictors of divorce – generally, lower-income individuals and families experience higher divorce rates, while higher-income couples are more likely to stay married. Financial stress can strain marriages, and economic stability often provides a buffer that helps couples remain together. Here’s what the data shows about income and divorce:

• Low Income, Higher Divorce: Divorce disproportionately affects lower-income Americans. Individuals earning under $10,000 per year have the highest divorce rates – studies indicate close to 45% of ever-married people in this income bracket have been divorced . This is an exceptionally high proportion, far above the national divorce rate. Part of this is because financial insecurity (job instability, debt, inability to meet basic needs) creates conflict and instability in relationships. Couples facing chronic unemployment or poverty often report greater stress, which can contribute to marital breakdown. In addition, those with very low incomes may marry younger on average and have less access to resources like counseling, further raising the risk of divorce.




• Higher Income, Lower Divorce: Divorce rates decrease sharply as income increases. By the time you get to middle-class incomes, the odds of divorce are significantly lower. For example, for individuals earning around $50,000–$75,000, the divorce rate might be on the order of ~30% (lifetime chance) – substantially below the 45% of the lowest bracket. Once you reach six-figure incomes, divorce rates level off around 30% or below . One analysis compiling data from the American Community Survey illustrated that divorce rates fall steeply from the lowest incomes up to about $200,000, flattening out thereafter . In fact, above $200k, the divorce rate stays in a narrower band (roughly 20–30%), with some fluctuations at the very high end possibly due to small sample sizes . The bottom line is that affluence is a protective factor against divorce. Higher income often correlates with higher education and marrying at later ages – all factors that contribute to marital stability. Financial security can reduce one of the major sources of marital conflict (money problems).




• Economic Policy Impact: Interestingly, recent research suggests that improving the economic circumstances of low-income individuals can reduce divorce rates. For instance, a 2022 UCLA/RAND study found that when U.S. states raised the minimum wage by $1, divorce rates declined by 7–15% among low-wage earners in the following years . The logic is that even a modest boost in income eases financial strain on families, leading to fewer breakups. (The same study noted that higher minimum wages also led young adults to delay marriage slightly, which in turn leads to more stable marriages later .) This finding reinforces that economic stress and divorce are linked – policies addressing income inequality can have measurable benefits for family stability .

In summary, money matters in marriage. Lower-income couples face greater divorce risks, while those with greater financial resources have more stable marriages on average. It’s important to note that income is often intertwined with other factors like education and community support. Nonetheless, these divorce statistics by income bracket make it clear that economic hardship is a significant risk factor for divorce. Efforts to alleviate poverty and improve financial security (such as job programs or minimum wage increases) may indirectly help lower the divorce rate among vulnerable populations .

Family Structure and Divorce Outcomes

Family structure – both the family one grows up in and the family one creates through marriage – has a profound influence on divorce outcomes. Certain patterns in family background and marital situation are associated with higher or lower divorce rates. Here we analyze how factors like upbringing, children, and remarriage affect the likelihood of divorce:

• Parental Divorce (Intergenerational Effects): One of the strongest predictors of a person’s divorce risk is whether their parents divorced. Children of divorced parents are significantly more likely to divorce in their own marriages. Statistics show that children of divorce are about 35% more likely to experience a divorce themselves compared to people from intact two-parent families . If both spouses were raised in divorced families, the risk can be even higher. This pattern, sometimes called the “divorce cycle,” has been documented in sociological research: one study found that if one spouse’s parents divorced, the couple’s divorce risk is ~50% higher, and if both spouses’ parents divorced, their divorce risk could be nearly 200% higher (about double the rate of couples from non-divorced families) . The reasons may include learned behaviors (children may internalize less effective conflict resolution skills or view divorce as an acceptable solution because they witnessed it growing up) and selection factors (parental divorce often leads to other stresses like economic hardship which can carry into the child’s adulthood). Bottom line: coming from a broken home statistically makes divorce more likely – though certainly many individuals from divorced families go on to have long, happy marriages.




• Presence of Children: Whether a couple has children (and even the sex of children) can influence marital stability. Generally, having children reduces the likelihood of divorce, up to a point – many couples choose to stay together for the kids, and the family bond can be a stabilizing force. Couples without children face a slightly higher risk of splitting, especially in early years, since there may be less “glue” holding them together. Interesting research has even found that couples with only daughters have a somewhat higher divorce rate than those with sons. For example, spouses with three daughters are about 10% more likely to divorce than spouses with three sons . Historically, it’s been theorized that fathers might be more inclined to remain engaged in marriage when they have sons (due to traditional gender preferences), though recent data suggests the gap is narrowing. By 2025, the difference is modest but still observable in large datasets – daughters are slightly associated with higher divorce probability. On the whole, having children (especially multiple children) is associated with a lower divorce rate during the child-rearing years, as many parents try to keep the family together. However, marriages that survive only “for the kids” may end once the children are grown – contributing to some of the increase in divorces among older adults (empty nest divorces).




• First Marriages vs. Remarriages: The structure of one’s current marriage (whether it’s a first marriage or a remarriage) dramatically affects divorce odds. Second and third marriages have a higher failure rate than first marriages. The often-cited statistics are that roughly 40–50% of first marriages in the U.S. eventually end in divorce, 60% of second marriages end in divorce, and roughly 70%+ of third marriages end in divorce . In other words, the divorce rate climbs with each subsequent marriage. While the exact percentages can vary by source (and some argue the second-marriage divorce rate isn’t quite that high), there is consistent evidence that remarriages are less stable. Why? One reason is selection: people who divorce once are statistically more likely to have personal or circumstantial factors (e.g. higher willingness to leave a marriage, or ongoing financial/relationship stressors) that carry into later marriages. Additionally, second marriages often involve stepchildren or blended families, which can introduce additional stresses. Conflicts in stepfamilies (over childrearing, finances, loyalties, etc.) can strain remarriages. By 2025, a significant portion of divorces are actually divorces from second marriages. The average length of a first marriage that ends in divorce is around 8 years, while for second marriages it’s only around 7 years – indicating many remarriages hit difficulties early. For those entering a remarriage, being aware of these statistics is important; seeking premarital counseling and clarifying expectations can help improve the odds.




• Cohabitation and Family Formation: Another family-structure factor is whether couples live together before marriage. In past decades, couples who cohabited premaritally had higher divorce rates than those who did not, but this gap has largely closed in recent years. Today, most couples do live together before marriage, and research suggests that cohabitation in itself is no longer a strong predictor of divorce if the couple is engaged or clearly committed when they move in. However, serial cohabitation (living with multiple partners before marriage) is linked to higher divorce risk. This likely ties into family structure in that cohabitation can be seen as a stage in modern family formation. By 2025, the social norm of living together first may actually contribute to the declining divorce rate – some unstable relationships may end during cohabitation rather than turning into marriages that would have ended in divorce. In summary, cohabitation has a complex relationship with divorce, but one’s approach to family formation (whether they marry directly or live together first) does influence the stability of the eventual marriage.

In sum, family structure factors shape divorce outcomes in powerful ways. A person’s family-of-origin, whether they have kids, and whether they are in a first or subsequent marriage all contribute to their likelihood of divorcing. Those from stable, married-parent homes who wait to have children within a first marriage have some of the lowest divorce risks. Conversely, individuals from divorced families, in blended/stepfamily situations, or in later marriages should be mindful of the elevated statistical risks and possibly take extra steps to fortify their relationships. The good news is that awareness and proactive efforts (like counseling or family therapy) can mitigate many of these risk factors. Family structure is not destiny, but it is a noteworthy piece of the divorce puzzle.

Religion and Divorce

Religious affiliation and practices are closely linked with marriage stability. In general, individuals who are actively religious tend to have lower divorce rates than those with no religious ties – though there are variations among different faith groups. Religion can influence values around marriage, provide community support, and encourage couples to persevere. Here’s what the data shows about religion and divorce in the U.S.:

• Lower Risk for Religious Individuals: People with strong religious beliefs or regular religious attendance have a lower risk of divorce. One statistic indicates that being devout can cut the risk of divorce by about 14% compared to the average, whereas having no religious affiliation is associated with a 14% higher likelihood of divorce . In other words, faithful church/synagogue/mosque attendees are less likely to end their marriages than secular or non-practicing individuals. Part of this effect is cultural – many religions strongly emphasize the sanctity of marriage and may discourage divorce except in dire circumstances. Additionally, houses of worship often provide counseling resources and social support for couples, which can help during marital difficulties. It’s important to note the distinction: simply identifying with a religion nominally may not protect a marriage; it’s active practice (such as attending services regularly) that correlates with greater marital stability . Couples who pray together or engage in faith-based activities tend to report higher marital satisfaction, which likely contributes to lower divorce rates.




• Differences Among Faith Groups: Divorce rates vary by religious group, reflecting both theological views on divorce and demographic factors. According to a Pew Research Center analysis, the group with the highest divorce rate in the U.S. is Historically Black Protestants – about 19% of adults in that category are divorced or separated . (This group includes many African-American Protestant denominations; socio-economic factors and younger marriage ages in this community contribute to the higher divorce figure.) Evangelical Protestants have a divorce rate around 14%, and Mainline (traditional) Protestants around 12% . Catholics also come in around 12% divorced, which is slightly below the national average . Notably, Americans with no religion (“Unaffiliated”) have a divorce rate of roughly 11% – that’s actually on par with or slightly lower than some Christian groups, which may be surprising. However, the “Unaffiliated” category includes many young people who may not have married yet; when controlled for age and marriage rates, those with no religion do have a higher propensity to divorce (as noted above, 14% higher risk). On the lower end of the spectrum, Non-Christian faiths tend to have the lowest divorce rates. For example, Hindus have the lowest divorce rate of any major religious group – only about 5% are divorced . Mormons (Latter-day Saints) also have relatively low divorce (~7%), as do Muslims (~8%) and Orthodox Jews (~9%) . These lower rates often reflect strong cultural norms against divorce and community expectations to resolve marital problems.




• Religious Doctrine vs. Practice: It’s worth noting that some of the highest-divorce states (the Bible Belt in the South) are also some of the most religious states. This seems like a paradox – how can a highly religious region have more divorces? Researchers point out that factors like earlier age at marriage and lower income in those states counteract the religious effect. In individual terms, a practicing religious couple within, say, Alabama might have a low chance of divorce; but overall rates in Alabama are high because many marry young there. Meanwhile, heavily secular states in the Northeast have low divorce rates largely because people marry later and with more economic security. So, while individual religiosity is protective, the broader social context matters too. Another insight: certain conservative Christian subgroups (like fundamentalist Protestants) actually show higher divorce rates despite strong doctrine against divorce – possibly due to marrying very young and having limited marriage preparation. In contrast, Catholics (whose church also opposes divorce) and more community-integrated Protestants often have more marriage support structures in place.

In summary, religion can be a stabilizing force in marriage, but its influence is interwoven with cultural and economic factors. Those who are active in a faith community are less likely to divorce, all else equal. The lowest divorce rates are observed among Americans belonging to faiths or denominations that place heavy emphasis on lifelong marriage (and which often have strong family cohesion norms), while the highest divorce rates are found among groups facing greater socio-economic challenges despite religious beliefs. Regardless of denomination, many churches, temples, and mosques now offer marital enrichment programs, recognizing that preventing divorce benefits families and communities. From an individual perspective, sharing a common faith and regularly practicing it together can strengthen a couple’s bond and commitment, which often translates into a lower probability of divorce .

Education and Divorce

Education level is another key factor linked to divorce outcomes. Over the past few decades, a clear “divorce divide” by education has emerged: those with higher education (college degrees) have significantly lower divorce rates than those with only a high school education or less. Here’s what the research and statistics show about education and divorce:

• Higher Education = Lower Divorce Risk: Individuals with college degrees, especially a bachelor’s degree or higher, have much lower divorce rates than less-educated individuals. One dataset found that the divorce rate for people with only a high school diploma was about 45.3% (meaning roughly 45% of those marriages ended in divorce), whereas for those with a bachelor’s degree it was only 25.9% . In other words, the likelihood of divorce for a college-educated person was roughly half that of someone with just a high school education. Another way to look at it: The National Center for Health Statistics found that 78% of college-educated women were still married after 20 years, compared to only about 40% of women with a high school education after 20 years . This education gap in marital stability has been widening – back in the 1970s, college grads and non-grads had more similar divorce rates, but today marriage has become much more durable among the well-educated.




• Why Education Matters: Education often correlates with factors that protect against divorce. Those who obtain a college degree typically marry later (after finishing schooling, often in their mid-20s or later) – and marrying at an older age greatly reduces divorce risk. Higher education also usually leads to higher income, which relieves some financial stresses that can cause marital conflict. Education may also impart better communication or problem-solving skills that couples can use to navigate issues. Moreover, there may be differing social norms: college-educated individuals are more likely to view marriage as a planned milestone (something entered into carefully, once certain economic stability is achieved), whereas those with less education may marry younger or due to life events (e.g. unplanned pregnancy), which can set the stage for challenges. It’s important to note these are general trends – many less-educated couples have strong marriages, and some highly educated couples divorce – but the statistical trends are robust. For example, researchers have noted that since the 1980s, virtually all the decline in divorce has been among the college-educated, while divorce rates for those without a four-year degree have remained relatively higher.




• Some College vs. Bachelor’s: There is also a gradation. Those with “some college” (like an associate’s degree or incomplete college) have divorce rates in between high school and bachelor’s level. They do better than those with no college, but not as well as those who completed a 4-year degree. It appears completing a bachelor’s degree is a key threshold – it often means marrying later and with more career/financial stability. On the other hand, people who start college but don’t finish might end up with student debt or lower income jobs, which could add stress, partly explaining their intermediate divorce outcomes.




• Education of Both Spouses: Marital stability is highest when both spouses are well-educated. If both husband and wife have a college degree, their divorce odds are particularly low. There is also evidence that disparities in education can matter: for instance, if one spouse has significantly more education than the other, it can sometimes create differences in perspectives or earning power that cause tension (though this effect is less studied than overall education level). Generally, the lowest divorce rates of all are among couples who are both college graduates marrying in their late 20s or 30s, with stable careers. This has created a scenario where marriage is thriving among the educated class, sometimes referred to as the “marriage gap.”

To illustrate the numbers: According to one analysis (Bowling Green State University, 2018 data), the annual divorce rate per 1,000 individuals was 16.4 for those with high school or less, but only 12.5 per 1,000 for those with a Master’s degree . That translates to a much lower lifetime risk for the higher-educated group. Thus, education is a major protective factor. Encouraging educational attainment (and the life stability that comes with it) appears to indirectly encourage more stable marriages. This is one reason why the decline in the U.S. divorce rate is partly attributed to more Americans (especially women) achieving higher education in recent decades, which has contributed to more resilient marriages .

Why People Get Divorced: Leading Causes

We’ve examined who is likeliest to divorce – by state, age, income, family background, etc. But another crucial aspect is why people get divorced. What reasons do couples give for ending their marriages? Understanding the common causes of divorce can help contextualize the statistics and guide prevention efforts. Research has consistently found a handful of core issues that crop up in divorce narratives. According to large surveys of divorced couples and individuals, the top reasons for divorce are:

• Lack of Commitment: This is the number one cited cause of divorce in many studies. About 75% of divorced individuals in one survey said a lack of commitment from one or both spouses was a major factor in the breakup . This can manifest as one partner not being fully invested in the marriage, not putting in effort to resolve problems, or simply “growing apart” over time. When couples drift and stop working on the relationship, divorce often follows. Notably, in the same study, lack of commitment was also the most common answer when people were asked about the “final straw” that ended the marriage .




• Infidelity / Extramarital Affairs: Marital infidelity is another leading cause. Around 59–60% of divorced respondents cite a spouse’s affair or cheating as a significant reason for their divorce . Infidelity often deals a fatal blow to trust in a marriage. Whether it’s a one-time incident or a long-term affair, cheating is extremely hard for many marriages to overcome. In some cases infidelity is the final symptom of other problems (lack of intimacy or commitment), but on its own it is a direct cause for a huge share of divorces. It’s telling that in surveys, about 31% of couples mutually agree infidelity was a top cause, but nearly 60% of individuals (one or the other partner) will point to infidelity – implying sometimes one spouse feels it much more acutely .




• Excessive Conflict and Arguing: Persistent conflict, arguing, and poor communication rank very high as well. About 57% of divorced individuals say “too much conflict or arguing” was a major contributor to their divorce . All couples have disagreements, but it’s the inability to resolve arguments in a healthy way that erodes a marriage over time. Constant fighting, yelling matches, and escalating conflicts (or conversely, stonewalling and never productively discussing issues) are common preludes to divorce. In some cases conflict stems from personality clashes or incompatibility (19% cited basic “incompatibility” as a reason in one study) . Communication breakdown is often at the heart of this – not feeling heard or understood by one’s spouse in repeated arguments. Over years, negative communication patterns can become entrenched, making reconciliation difficult.




• Marrying Too Young: About 45% cite getting married too young as a factor in their divorce . This is consistent with the statistical higher risk of early marriage we discussed. People who marry in their teens or very early 20s sometimes find that they and their partner change significantly as they mature, leading to incompatibilities. They may not have had the chance to establish independent adult identities or careers, which can create stress on the marriage. “We were just too young” is a refrain in many divorce stories – often tied to other issues like finances or infidelity as well.




• Financial Problems: Money troubles are a well-known source of marital strain. Over 36% of divorced individuals in one large survey said financial problems (disagreements over money, debt, etc.) were a major cause of divorce . Another poll of divorce lawyers and financial analysts found “basic incompatibility” and money issues among the top three causes of divorce, with money issues cited in about 22% of divorces . Conflicts may arise from different spending habits, one spouse being a spender and the other a saver, hidden debts or financial dishonesty, or simply the stress of not having enough money. It’s often said that financial stress doesn’t create character, it reveals it – meaning financial hardship can exacerbate other issues (like conflict or lack of commitment).




• Substance Abuse: Alcohol or drug abuse by one spouse is another commonly reported cause. About 35% of individuals mention substance abuse as a contributing factor to their divorce . Addictions can lead to financial problems, trust issues, neglect of family responsibilities, and in some cases abuse – all severely damaging to a marriage. If one partner repeatedly abuses substances and refuses to seek help, the other may feel divorce is the only viable solution for their well-being (and that of any children).




• Domestic Violence: Domestic violence and abuse is cited as a cause in roughly 23–25% of divorces . Physical, emotional, or verbal abuse by a partner often necessitates ending the marriage for one’s safety. Many abused spouses endure a cycle of abuse for years before finally leaving – often saying a specific incident was the “final straw.” It’s notable that domestic violence is frequently underreported; the true incidence as a cause for divorce could be higher. In particular, among women filing for divorce later in life (“gray divorce”), studies find that abuse (in various forms) remains one of the most common reasons cited .

Other reasons that appear less frequently include health problems, lack of support from family, religious differences, and lack of intimacy. For example, “lack of love or intimacy” and sexual incompatibility can be factors, though they tend to overlap with lack of commitment or infidelity issues. Incompatibility in general (different lifestyles or goals) is a broad reason that underpins a lot of divorces as well . It’s also worth noting that many divorces have multiple causes – rarely is it just one thing. Often a combination of the above issues interact (e.g. financial stress leading to conflict, which leads to one spouse withdrawing commitment, etc.).

Understanding why people get divorced is crucial for addressing the root problems. Many of the top causes – commitment, communication, conflict resolution – are potentially solvable with the right interventions (premarital education, counseling, financial planning, etc.). In fact, relationship educators often design programs to target these very issues. But when these problems go unresolved, they accumulate until divorce becomes the outcome. As the data shows, the leading causes of divorce have remained fairly consistent over time: marriages usually end because of infidelity, constant fighting, financial woes, substance abuse, or abuse – often compounded by marrying too young or not being fully committed from the start . By recognizing these common pitfalls, couples can hopefully work proactively to avoid them, and those contemplating divorce can better understand the factors at play in their relationship.

No-Fault vs. Contested Divorce in the U.S.

Divorce laws and how divorces are processed (contested versus uncontested) also play a role in the landscape of divorce in America. Over the last 50 years, the U.S. underwent a revolution in divorce law with the adoption of no-fault divorce in all 50 states. “No-fault” means a couple can divorce without having to prove wrongdoing by either spouse – typically citing “irreconcilable differences” or an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. This section compares no-fault vs. contested divorce cases and provides a breakdown of how most divorces proceed today:

• Rise of No-Fault Divorce: Starting with California in 1970, states gradually adopted no-fault divorce statutes, and by 2010 every U.S. state had some form of no-fault divorce law on the books . This was a monumental change from earlier times when one spouse had to be “at fault” (e.g. proven adultery, abandonment, cruelty) for a divorce to be granted. Today, in all states, a couple can mutually agree to divorce without assigning blame. Many states still allow fault-based grounds (like adultery or abuse) as an option, but they are not required. The shift to no-fault made divorces procedurally easier to obtain and arguably contributed to the rise in divorce rates in the 1970s (by freeing many unhappily married people who previously might have felt trapped). However, research suggests no-fault laws alone did not create the long-term divorce surge – societal changes were the bigger factor . By 2025, the norm is that divorces are filed under no-fault grounds in the vast majority of cases.




• Contested vs. Uncontested Cases: Even when filing no-fault, a divorce can be contested or uncontested. Uncontested means both spouses agree on all major issues (division of property, custody, support, etc.), allowing the divorce to proceed without litigation. Contested means there are one or more disputes that must be resolved by the court (or through lawyers’ negotiation). The good news is that the vast majority of divorces are settled without a trial. In fact, it’s estimated that around 98% of divorces are ultimately handled as uncontested cases – the parties reach a settlement agreement and finalize the divorce amicably . Even divorces that start out with conflict usually end in a negotiated settlement before reaching the courtroom. Judges often encourage settlements and only a small fraction of cases go all the way to a trial decision. (Notably, that 98% includes cases that may have interim disputes but are settled by the end – it doesn’t mean 98% of couples agree immediately, but that nearly all eventually resolve outside of trial .) This is why you hear that divorce trials are relatively rare despite the contentious image of divorce – most couples manage to avoid a protracted courtroom battle.




• Prevalence of No-Fault Filings: Nearly all divorces filed today cite no-fault grounds. For example, “irreconcilable differences” is by far the most common basis stated in divorce petitions across the country. Fault-based divorces (like adultery-based filings) are now relatively rare – they do happen, but usually only when a spouse wants an advantage in a specific issue (such as alimony or to overcome a waiting period) or out of principle. Some states have retained fault grounds that can impact the division of assets or support (e.g., proven adultery might bar an alimony claim in certain jurisdictions). But even in those states, most attorneys advise using no-fault unless there’s a strategic reason otherwise. The ease of no-fault has also led to more unilateral divorces (where one spouse can end the marriage even if the other disagrees). In the past, a truly contested divorce could be blocked or delayed if no fault was proven – not so now. In sum, the comparative breakdown is that nearly 100% of U.S. divorces are effectively no-fault divorces, and only a very small share involve contested fault litigation.




• Contested Issues: When divorces are contested, the disputes usually center on children or money, not the fact of divorce itself. Common contested issues include child custody arrangements, child support amounts, spousal support (alimony), and division of complex assets. These contested divorces can take much longer and be costlier. But even with disputes, most couples eventually compromise or go to mediation to settle. The court system strongly prefers settlements – as one lawyer quipped, judges are “happier if the cases are not contested since it frees up their calendars” . The tiny minority of cases that remain hotly contested may drag on for a year or more and rack up significant legal fees. Nonetheless, 2025’s reality is that such drawn-out courtroom divorces are the exception, not the rule.




• Who Initiates Divorce: An interesting aspect of the no-fault era is the gender of who files. Consistently, about two-thirds of divorce filings are initiated by women . One study put it at 69% initiated by wives . This trend exists in every country with no-fault divorce and in the U.S. across all groups . Researchers suggest this is because women, on average, report lower relationship quality and may be less willing to stay in an unsatisfying marriage (especially if they are economically able to leave). The no-fault system enables women to file without needing a specific fault reason. This statistic doesn’t mean women are “to blame” – rather, it reflects that they more often take the formal step to end a marriage that is already troubled. In many cases, both spouses recognize the issues, but the wife is simply the one to file the paperwork first.

In summary, no-fault divorce is now universal in America, and it has fundamentally reshaped how divorces proceed. The process is usually administrative and negotiation-focused rather than a dramatic court showdown. Uncontested divorces are the norm – about 98% of cases settle with a marital settlement agreement outside of court . Only a small fraction are true contested divorces that require a judge’s ruling on major issues. This doesn’t mean divorces aren’t painful or contentious – many are – but it means that the legal resolution typically happens through paperwork and settlement rather than courtroom battles. The advent of no-fault made it easier to get out of a bad marriage, but it also stripped away the public airing of grievances; today’s divorce proceedings focus on practical separation of lives more than assigning marital blame. For Splitifi’s purposes, understanding this landscape helps frame our guidance: most users can expect a relatively straightforward legal process (especially if both parties cooperate), even if the emotional process remains challenging.

Regional Divorce Trends Over Time

Divorce trends have not been uniform across the United States – different regions have distinct patterns, although all regions have seen declines in divorce rates over time. We’ve touched on state-by-state differences; here we zoom out to the regional level (typically, Northeast, Midwest, South, West) and look at how divorce has shifted over the years in each.

• The South and “Bible Belt”: The Southern U.S. historically has had the highest divorce rates. States like Arkansas, Alabama, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Texas long recorded above-average divorce frequencies. Culturally, this seems paradoxical given the South’s conservative, family-oriented reputation, but factors like earlier marriage age and lower median incomes contributed to higher divorce. Over time, the South is still the region with the highest divorce rates, but those rates have fallen from their peaks. For example, the Census Bureau reported that in 2022 the national divorce rate for women was 7.1 per 1,000 (women age 15+) – and Southern states like Arkansas were well above that (Arkansas ~11.9) . However, back in 2012, Arkansas’s rate was even higher (it ranked high then as well). Many Southern states saw their divorce rates rise from the 1970s to 1990s and then decline in the 2000s. The “Bible Belt” still leads in divorce, but the gap has narrowed slightly. Notably, Texas – a large Southern state – has a relatively low crude divorce rate (~1.9 per 1,000 people in recent CDC data) , showing the South isn’t monolithic. Within the South, the “Deep South” and Appalachian states tend to be higher than say, the mid-Atlantic South (e.g., Virginia).




• The West: The Western region has some of the highest and lowest divorce states. Nevada (West) historically had an extremely high divorce rate (due to lenient laws attracting out-of-state couples for quick divorces). In 1990, Nevada’s divorce rate was off the charts at 11.4 per 1,000 people . By 2022 this fell to 4.2 , which, while much lower, is still higher than most states. Western states like Wyoming, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington have generally higher-than-average divorce rates (Wyoming and Idaho are often top 5 as mentioned). On the other hand, the West also includes California, which despite its reputation, has incomplete reporting but is thought to be near the middle, and Utah, which has a relatively low divorce rate given its strong religious (LDS) influence despite early marriages (Utah’s rate ~3.1 per 1,000 people) . Over time, the West saw a big spike in the 1970s (California’s no-fault law influenced that), but now Western divorce rates have normalized somewhat. Western states largely follow the national decline trend. One interesting metric is the marriage-to-divorce ratio: Western states still have a lot of marriages and a lot of divorces – e.g., in 2021 Nevada had a marriage rate more than twice any other state and a high divorce rate to match . As of 2023, the West’s divorce rate is generally second only to the South.




• The Midwest: The Midwest tends to be around or slightly below the national average in divorce. States like Ohio, Michigan, Illinois have moderate rates. For instance, Illinois was noted as one of the lowest divorce states (only ~1.2 per 1,000 people in crude rate) . The Midwest has many states with strong family stability and also some rural high-divorce pockets. Over time, Midwestern divorce rates rose and fell in line with national patterns, but the levels stayed a bit lower than the South. By 2022, Midwestern states like Nebraska (2.6 per 1,000) and Kansas (1.9) have fairly low crude rates , whereas Missouri and Ohio are closer to average (~3.0–3.4 per 1,000 in earlier years, trending down). The Midwest as a region hasn’t been in the extremes; it’s a bellwether of national trends. Notably, many Midwest states saw significant declines in the 2000s. For example, Michigan’s divorce rate dropped from around 4.0 in 1990 to about 2.3 in recent years .




• The Northeast: The Northeastern U.S. consistently shows the lowest divorce rates. States like Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Connecticut have long been at the bottom of the divorce rankings. Cultural factors (people marry later, higher education, higher costs of living delaying marriage) and religious composition (higher Catholic populations historically) contributed to fewer divorces. In 2022, several Northeast states posted divorce rates around 2 per 1,000 or less (for example, Massachusetts ~1.4, DC ~2.0 (DC is not Northeast but an urban area with similar pattern)) . Vermont’s 4.6 per 1,000 women rate (≈2.0 per 1,000 people) was lowest nationally as noted . Over time, the Northeast never experienced as high a divorce surge in the ’70s/’80s and thus had less extreme decline. It’s been relatively stable and low. Some Northeast states did see slight upticks after no-fault adoption (New York was the last state to allow no-fault, in 2010), but overall the region remains the “least divorcing” part of America. New York’s divorce rate, for example, is about 2.4 per 1,000 people (roughly 8 per 1,000 women) , well below places like the South/West.




• Regional Culture and Trends: It’s fascinating to see how regional culture intersects with divorce. The Bible Belt paradox (religious South with high divorces) and the Blue-state paradox (more liberal Northeast with low divorces) show that values alone don’t determine outcomes – age at marriage, economics, and education play big roles. Over time, all regions peaked in divorce around late 1970s or 1980s and have declined since. The South and West had higher peaks (around 6 divorces per 1,000 people in some states) and have come down to ~3–4, while the Northeast peaked maybe around 4 and is down to ~2. Another trend: urban vs rural – urbanized states (often coastal) have lower divorce rates than more rural states. For instance, Massachusetts (urban, educated) vs Arkansas (more rural, lower incomes) illustrate this gap. However, within states, urban centers can have higher divorce in some cases (due to different marriage patterns).




• Pandemic Effect and Recent Trends: Regionally, the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 caused a dip in divorces across the board as courts closed and couples delayed proceedings. All regions saw that reflected in 2020’s sharply lower divorce numbers (national rate fell to 2.3, an all-time low) . In 2021 and 2022, divorces ticked up a bit in each region as backlogs cleared (national rate back to 2.5 in 2021, then 2.4) . Some states like Florida actually saw a rebound in 2021 (Florida’s rate went from 3.0 in 2020 to 3.4 in 2021, then down to 3.1 in 2022) . This pattern was common: a brief surge after lockdowns ended, then a return to the downward trend. Moving forward, demographers predict divorce rates will continue to be low or even fall further in many regions, as marriage itself is becoming less common among those most at risk of unstable marriages.

To visualize these trends, one can imagine a map of the U.S. colored by divorce rate – the Southeast and Mountain West would be in warmer colors (higher rates) and the Northeast and Northern Plains in cooler colors (lower rates). Over time, that map has generally cooled down – even the hot spots aren’t as hot as they used to be. For example, Arkansas’s divorce rate (highest in 2022) was 11.9 per 1,000 women , whereas a decade prior it was closer to 13–14. And Vermont’s rate (lowest) barely changed from maybe ~4 to 4.6 over that period – it was low and stayed low. The national average divorce statistic disguises these regional differences; thus, Splitifi’s analysis makes them explicit, reinforcing our position as an authority that understands the nuance beneath the aggregates.

Florida Divorce Trends: What’s Changing in 2025?

Florida warrants a special spotlight in any divorce trends discussion – not only because it’s a large and diverse state, but also because it has recently undergone significant legal changes impacting divorce. Here we examine Florida’s divorce statistics and what is changing as of 2025:

• Divorce Rate in Florida: Florida has consistently had a higher-than-average divorce rate. As of the latest data, Florida’s crude divorce rate is around 3.1 per 1,000 people . This is above the national rate of ~2.4 . Within the state, the divorce rate translates to tens of thousands of divorces annually (approximately 80,000+ divorces per year in recent times, given Florida’s large population). Florida’s rate has been on a downward trend over the past decade, mirroring national patterns. In 2010, Florida’s divorce rate was about 4.4 per 1,000, and by 2019 it was 3.5 . It dipped to 3.0 in 2020 (pandemic effect), briefly rose to 3.4 in 2021, and as of 2022 settled at 3.1 . So overall, Florida’s divorces are trending down, though a bit unevenly. Historically, Florida has often ranked in the upper tier of states for divorce (though not as high as Arkansas or Nevada). It shares characteristics with other Southern states – relatively high divorce in rural north Florida and Panhandle, and somewhat lower in the more urbanized areas like Miami. Still, even Miami-Dade county has a substantial divorce churn, given Florida’s high population of retirees and transplanted individuals (support networks might be weaker for some, contributing to marital instability).




• Florida vs. Other States: Florida’s divorce rate (3.1) is similar to that of Alabama or Arkansas a few years ago, and higher than large states like California (which is ~2.5, though not officially reported) or New York (~2.4). Among the nation’s most populous states, Florida’s divorce rate is one of the highest. For example, Texas is only ~2.1, and Illinois ~1.2 , so Florida stands out. Part of this is demographic – Florida has a significant number of older adults (who as noted are now more prone to divorce), and also a relatively transient population which can correlate with higher divorce. There’s even an observation that retirement hubs (Florida is a prime one) have seen rising “gray divorce,” as people who migrate to retire may end up splitting in their later years. Florida also has a culturally diverse population, with differing marriage norms (from very traditional to very liberal pockets). Central Florida and the coasts see many second marriages (as people relocate, remarry, etc.), and second marriages have higher divorce rates, as discussed. All these factors contribute to Florida’s above-average divorce statistics.




• Legal Reforms in 2023: The big news in Florida divorce trends going into 2025 is the legal reform of alimony and custody laws that took effect in July 2023. Florida passed Senate Bill 1416 in 2023, which eliminated permanent alimony and overhauled how alimony is awarded . This is one of the most significant changes in Florida family law in decades. Under the new law, Florida courts no longer grant permanent (lifelong) spousal support. Instead, there are set time limits based on the length of the marriage (e.g., alimony generally cannot exceed 50% of the length of a short marriage, etc.) . The focus is on “durational alimony” that lasts for a finite period, and “bridge-the-gap” alimony for short-term needs . The idea is to modernize and make outcomes more predictable. Additionally, SB 1416 makes it easier for alimony payors to modify or terminate alimony upon retirement age – a big change benefiting older divorcees. Florida also adjusted custody norms (there were proposals to presume 50-50 custody, though the final bill emphasized the child’s best interest without an explicit 50-50 presumption). These changes answer long-standing debates in Florida, where permanent alimony was considered outdated by some. As of 2025, Florida divorces filed now operate under these new rules, which will likely influence how divorce settlements are negotiated.




• Impact of Reforms: What’s changing in Florida in 2025 is that we may see fewer contentious battles over lifetime alimony, since that option is off the table. This could potentially make divorces easier to settle (because the range of alimony outcomes is narrower and more defined). It might also be encouraging some long-married but unhappily wed couples to divorce now that they won’t be on the hook for permanent alimony. However, it may discourage some lower-earning spouses from divorcing, knowing they won’t get lifetime support. It’s too early to see the statistical effect, but Florida divorce filings did surge slightly in mid-2023 (anecdotally, some spouses rushed to file before the law to try to still get permanent alimony, while others waited for the law to avoid it). By 2025, those cases are working through the system. We’ll be watching Florida’s divorce rate to see if it blips up or down due to the reforms.




• Florida’s Unique Trends: Florida’s divorce seasonality and patterns have some quirks. There’s often a spike in January (as with many states – the “new year, new start” effect). Also, because Florida is a no-fault state with a short residency requirement (6 months), some people move to Florida to file divorce (especially military or transient individuals who find it convenient). This isn’t as famous as Nevada’s situation historically, but it’s a factor. South Florida’s large immigrant communities also have varied divorce patterns – some cultures have lower divorce rates, but assimilation can change that over generations. Overall, Florida is a microcosm of many U.S. divorce trends: relatively high divorce among the less affluent north and rural areas, lower among the affluent suburbs, rising gray divorce among retirees, and now a forefront of legal change.

In summary, Florida in 2025 is seeing slightly declining divorce rates (down to ~3.1 per 1,000) but remains above the U.S. average. Culturally and demographically, it’s a state with many divorces, including later-life divorces. The big change is the end of permanent alimony as of 2023 – a reform that is reshaping post-divorce finances in Florida . Splitifi’s analysis suggests that these changes could make Florida’s divorce process more straightforward (fewer indefinite financial obligations), possibly even encouraging settlements. Floridians navigating divorce in 2025 need to understand the new rules: alimony awards will be shorter-term and there are clearer formulas to follow. This “new normal” in Florida divorce law is a prime example of how policy shifts can influence the divorce landscape. As we continue through 2025, we’ll monitor if Florida’s divorce rate edges downward further or if any new trends (such as an increase in filings by long-term married spouses seeking relief under the new law) emerge.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

The state of divorce in America in 2025 is characterized by historically low overall divorce rates, but with important nuances by region, demographic group, and individual circumstance. We have seen that divorce rates have fallen across the board since the 1980s – a testament to later marriages, better family planning, and perhaps the fact that fewer people marry impulsively today. The national divorce rate (around 2.4 per 1,000 population ) is the lowest it’s been in over 50 years. Yet, about 40-45% of marriages can still be expected to eventually end in divorce or separation, so divorce remains a common life event for millions of Americans.

By state and region, we learned the South and parts of the West report the highest divorce statistics (e.g., Arkansas, Oklahoma, Nevada leading in rates), while the Northeast reports the lowest (Massachusetts, Vermont, etc.) . By age, we saw that the bulk of divorces occur in the late 20s through 40s, even as “gray divorce” among seniors is rising . Income and education emerged as powerful protective factors – wealthier and college-educated couples divorce at markedly lower rates . Conversely, low-income couples face disproportionate challenges (with promising evidence that economic improvements can reduce divorces ).

We also delved into why people get divorced, highlighting that lack of commitment, infidelity, and incessant conflict are the top reasons cited for marital breakdown . Understanding these reasons helps frame the statistical trends: for instance, states or groups with higher divorce might be facing more of those risk factors. Family structure influences – such as coming from a divorced family or being in a second marriage – can elevate divorce risk, while religious practice and supportive community norms can lower it .

Legally, the U.S. divorce system in 2025 is fully a no-fault, settlement-driven regime, with nearly all cases resolved out of court and no-fault grounds available everywhere . Florida’s example showed how ongoing reforms (like ending permanent alimony) continue to evolve the divorce process . These changes aim to make divorces more equitable and less contentious, which may further influence trends (perhaps shortening the duration of conflict or affecting when people choose to file).

Splitifi’s Position: As a leading platform analyzing divorce statistics and trends, Splitifi is committed to staying at the forefront of these developments. The insights from this 2025 report solidify our understanding that divorce in America is becoming less frequent overall, but the quality of marital life and dissolution varies widely. Our data-driven approach – citing the CDC, Census Bureau, and academic studies – ensures that our advice and resources for users are grounded in reality. For example, knowing that financial strain is a top predictor of divorce, we provide tools for couples to navigate financial planning. Understanding that lack of communication is a leading cause, we emphasize counseling and communication workshops. Knowing the laws (like Florida’s reforms), we keep our legal guides up-to-date to empower users in every state.

Key takeaways for 2025: Couples who marry later, with financial stability and higher education, and who communicate effectively (possibly with shared religious or community values), have the best odds of “making it.” On the other hand, early marriage combined with economic hardship and weak support systems is often a recipe for why people get divorced more frequently in certain areas. The U.S. has made progress in reducing divorces, but about one million Americans each year still experience divorce (the 673,000 divorces recorded in 2022 correspond to roughly double that number of individuals) . Those going through it today benefit from clearer laws and a society more open about divorce, but they still face emotional and financial hurdles.

Splitifi’s mission is to continue analyzing these divorce rates 2025 and beyond, offering reliable information and guidance. By consolidating data from government and scholarly sources, we position ourselves as the authoritative source on U.S. divorce trends. Whether someone wants to compare their state’s divorce rate, understand the role of income or religion in divorce outcomes, or learn why people get divorced and how to avoid common pitfalls – this report provides a comprehensive resource. Going forward, Splitifi will monitor how trends evolve (Will the divorce rate fall even further? How will economic ups and downs affect marriages? What impact will post-pandemic dynamics have? etc.) and will update our findings.

In conclusion, the state of divorce in America in 2025 is one of cautious optimism: divorces are down, marriages are a bit more stable, and knowledge about maintaining relationships is more accessible than ever. Yet, divorce is by no means disappearing – it remains a significant social reality, one that requires understanding and support. By examining the data in depth, we equip individuals, policymakers, and professionals with the knowledge to foster stronger families and, when needed, navigate divorces with insight and compassion. Splitifi is proud to be at the forefront of this effort, harnessing data to illuminate the path forward for American families.

Comprehensive Source List – “State of Divorce in America 2025”

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.

   FastStats: Marriage and Divorce (Provisional 2022 Data). Retrieved 2025-05-10 from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/marriage-divorce.htm

2. Westrick-Payne, K., Manning, W. D., & Carlson, D. L. (2023).

   Divorce Rate in the United States: Geographic Variation, 2022. National Center for Family & Marriage Research Family Profile FP-23-24. Bowling Green State University.

3. National Center for Health Statistics.

   Divorce Rates by State, 1990-2022 – Interactive Map. Updated 2024. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/divorces.html

4. Rubin, A. (2024, June 5).

   “Arkansans Get Married More Than Most.” Axios Northwest Arkansas. https://www.axios.com/local/nw-arkansas/2024/06/05/arkansas-marriage-divorce-rates

5. Karney, B. R., Rauer, A. J., & Bradbury, T. N. (2022).

   “State Minimum-Wage Increases Delay Marriage and Reduce Divorce Among Low-Wage Earners.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(4), 957-976.

6. Julian, C. A. (2022).

   Median Age at First Divorce, 1970-2020. NCFMR Family Profile FP-22-23. Bowling Green State University.

7. Malo, M. (2024, October 22).

   “Gray Divorce Rates Have Tripled Since 1990.” U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/gray-divorce-trend-2024

8. Pew Research Center. (2024).

   Religious Landscape Study – Marital Status by Religious Group. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

9. Scott, S. B., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, E. S., & Markman, H. J. (2013).

   “Reasons for Divorce and Recollections of Premarital Intervention: Implications for Improving Relationship Education.” Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 54(6), 453-476.

10. Wilkinson, R., & Fink, N. (2022).

    Top Reasons for Divorce – National Survey Report. WF Lawyers Family-Law Research Division.

11. American Community Survey Public-Use Microdata Sample. (2022).

    Income, Education, and Marital History Variables. U.S. Census Bureau.

12. National Center for Health Statistics. (2024).

    National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 70 No. 17: Marriage, Cohabitation, and Divorce Patterns.

13. American Bar Association Family Law Section. (2024).

    Divorce Litigation and Settlement Statistics Brief.

14. Florida Legislature. (2023).

    Senate Bill 1416 – Dissolution of Marriage (Chapter 2023-286). Tallahassee, FL: State of Florida.

15. Florida Senate Committee on Judiciary. (2023).

    Bill Analysis and Fiscal Impact Statement for SB 1416.

16. UCLA Center for Social Statistics & RAND Corporation. (2021).

    Minimum-Wage Policy and Family Formation Data Set.

17. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. (2019).

    Divorce Rates by Educational Attainment – Supplement to ACS Table Series.

18. National Center for Family & Marriage Research. (2023).

    Family Profile FP-23-17: Five-Year Divorce Risk by Age at Marriage.

19. U.S. News & World Report Data Desk. (2023).

    State-Level Marriage and Divorce Dashboards, 2010-2022.

20. Bowling Green State University, NCFMR. (2024).

    Marriage-to-Divorce Ratio by State, 2021 Release.

These references encompass every dataset, peer-reviewed article, government report, and reputable news analysis cited in the 2025 Splitifi white paper.